I just read an interesting post over at Human Events. Seems some millionaire out in Kalifornia (of course! (Sorry Wirecutter)) is upset because our immigration laws are stopping him from hiring enough illegal aliens.
That's your basic example of the 'rich' in this country. In one sentence, this asswipe admits to flaunting the law publically by hiring illegal aliens, admits that he can spend less on payroll by hiring illegal aliens, thus increasing his profits, and he doesn't support Americans trying to make a living in todays jobless economy.
You may want to read the entire post, its pretty eye opening, but I especially like the following excerpt:
He said his illegal alien employees deserved amnesty because if “we keep them here and not do anything for them once they get old, that’s really extortion.”
As the punch line goes, “What’s this ‘we,’ paleface?”
Taxpayers have been subsidizing Chuck Herrin’s underpayment of his illegal labor force for decades, with skyrocketing taxes to pay for schools, roads, bridges, food stamps, health care and so on. Now Herrin thinks “we” are supposed to support his illegal employees in their old age, too.
Here’s another idea: How about a federal law mandating that employers of illegal aliens take responsibility for the people they hire? Why is the taxpayer on the hook for illegal aliens’ food, housing and medical care, when Chuck Herrin got 100 percent of the profit from their cheap labor?
We don’t allow chemical companies to dump pollutants in rivers, walk away and then say, “If we dump chemicals in rivers and we don’t clean them once the plant is gone, that’s really criminal.”
No, you dumped the chemicals — not “we.” And you, Chuck Herrin, got the cheap labor — not “we.”
“We” got hospital emergency rooms jammed with illegal aliens when we came in with heart attacks. “We” got the crime, drunk-driving and drug trafficking associated with illegal aliens. “We” got the overcrowded schools filled with kids whose illegal alien parents don’t pay property taxes. “We” get to press “one” for English.
The rich get richer, the poor get poorer. Because of the rich.
Will 'Mr.' Chuck Herrin be held accountable for flaunting our immigration laws? Don't hold your breath. This fucking Anti-American retard won't even get a fine.
But at least I get to say: Fuck YOU, Chuck Herrin. You are a serious piece of breathing shit. Keep in mind how you helped Americans find work when the shit hits the fan. Its folks who maintain your greedy, un-American, disgusting ideals who are going out first. And good riddance.
I can say all that, because of the Constitution. I have the right to voice (or type) my opinion. Ain't America grand?!
3 comments:
You may want to look up the difference between 'flaunt' and 'flout'. You've completely used the wrong term when you say "Flaunting the law", unless you meant he was running around waving a law book in the air yelling "Look! Look!"
Gee, everyone's a critic! Or at least those who hide behind anonymity.
You are, however, correct. I should have used flouting.
SO WHAT? That in no way detracts from the content of my post. And here's the kicker: Its MY post.
Please feel free to spell check and seek any grammatical errors in the following:
Go fuck yourself!
(And I ain't gonna fix it, so there! Pphhhhttttt!)
Post a Comment